TL;DR: The Iran conflict accelerated this week with Operation Epic Fury, pushing oil to $98 and the 10-year yield to 4.39%. The S&P 500 gave back all of its early-week gains and then some, closing Friday at 6,506. Our systems held steady with no allocation changes - the same positioning that sidestepped tech before the selloff continues to filter out the noise.
Week in Review
Monday and Tuesday offered a brief reprieve. The S&P 500 rallied to 6,716 by Tuesday close, the Dow touched 46,993, and the Nasdaq hit 22,479. Markets were trying to price in stability.
That didn't last.
Wednesday through Friday erased the rally and more. The Pentagon announced Operation Epic Fury on Friday - a major U.S. military escalation targeting Iranian military infrastructure. WTI crude, already elevated, surged past $98 a barrel after briefly touching $100 on Wednesday. The S&P 500 bled lower every session, closing the week at 6,506 - down roughly 3% from Tuesday's high. Tech-heavy names took the worst of it as rate expectations shifted.
The Fed held rates steady at 3.50-3.75% on Wednesday, voting 11-1 (Governor Miran dissenting in favor of a cut). Chair Powell struck a patient tone: goods inflation needs to slow as tariff effects work through, and oil prices tied to the Middle East add another layer of uncertainty. The dot plot still projects two cuts by year-end, but timing depends entirely on how the conflict evolves.
The 10-year Treasury yield climbed from 4.20% on Monday to 4.39% by Friday - the highest level this year. That's a 19 basis point move in a single week, reflecting both inflation concern and a flight from duration.
Gold pulled back hard from recent highs, falling roughly 4% to $4,607 an ounce. That's unusual in a risk-off week, but a stronger dollar and profit-taking after an extended run both played a role. Bitcoin held firm near $70,700, continuing its pattern of resilience during geopolitical stress.
WTI crude remains the dominant macro variable. At $98 - up from $64 in February - the oil shock is no longer theoretical. The Strait of Hormuz is a real chokepoint, and every escalation headline moves the barrel price.
Allocation Changes
None this week.
Both strategies held their existing positioning through all five sessions. The system evaluated conditions daily and saw no reason to change:
Index Rotation stays split between the S&P 500 and Dow with Nasdaq-100 off
Low Volatility holds 7 of 10 sectors with Technology, Real Estate, and Financials off
No trades. No signal flips, yet. We could see some action this week and some portfolio allocation changes.
The Bigger Picture
Three forces are colliding right now, and they don't resolve cleanly.
Oil at $98 is an inflation tax. Every $10 increase in crude adds roughly 0.4 percentage points to headline inflation and shaves about 0.2% off GDP. We've moved $34 per barrel since late February. That math isn't subtle.
The Fed is trapped. Powell's hand is forced. Cut rates and risk amplifying an oil-driven inflation spike. Hold and watch the economy slow into tighter financial conditions. The 11-1 vote tells you the committee is almost unanimously in wait-and-see mode - but waiting has a cost when yields are climbing on their own.
The conflict is escalating, not stabilizing. Operation Epic Fury is not a one-off strike. It's a campaign. The market hasn't priced in a prolonged disruption because, historically, these conflicts resolve faster than expected. Chatham House projects manageable global effects if oil stays in the $70-100 range. At $98, we're at the top of that range. Above $100 for sustained periods changes the math entirely.
The system's current positioning - cyclical sectors, no tech, no Nasdaq - looks right for this environment. Energy at 17% weight in the Low Volatility strategy is the largest sector position. That's not a war bet; it's where the signal pointed before the conflict began. The data led. Events confirmed.
THOR Risk Gauge

Equity exposure remains high across both strategies, but concentration is away from the most volatile pockets of the market. Oil-driven inflation risk and rising yields are headwinds, offset by disciplined sector selection that favors the parts of the economy benefiting from the current regime. The system is invested but selective - and that selectivity is doing the work right now.
Signal Watch
Index Rotation - Holdings as of 3/20/26
Index | Weight | Signal | Status |
Dow (DIA) | 48.70% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
S&P 500 (SPY) | 48.43% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) | 0.54% | Risk-Off | 🔴 |
Cash + T-Bills (BIL) | 2.11% | - | - |
Low Volatility - Holdings as of 3/20/26
Sector | Weight | Signal | Status |
Energy (XLE) | 17.19% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Materials (XLB) | 14.47% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Industrials (XLI) | 14.25% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Consumer Staples (XLP) | 13.84% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Utilities (XLU) | 13.21% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Consumer Disc (XLY) | 12.68% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Healthcare (XLV) | 12.56% | Risk-On | 🟢 |
Technology (XLK) | 0.45% | Risk-Off | 🔴 |
Real Estate (XLRE) | 0.34% | Risk-Off | 🔴 |
Financials (XLF) | 0.34% | Risk-Off | 🔴 |
Cash (BIL) | 0.92% | - | - |
Weekend Reading
Podcast: Behind the Ticker - Paul Marino from Themes ETFs joins Brad Roth to talk about 25+ years in asset management, the jump from journalism to wholesaling, and why thematic ETFs targeting China AI, humanoid robots, and next-gen tech are resonating with advisors right now. Listen on Spotify
How Will the Iran War Affect the Global Economy? - Chatham House / March 2026
The best macro framework for understanding the asymmetric impact of the conflict. Energy importers bear the brunt; the U.S. is relatively resilient as a net exporter. Their threshold analysis - manageable below $100 oil, structural damage above - is exactly where we're sitting right now.
The 2026 Iran War: An Initial Take and Implications - Oxford Economics / March 2026
Data-heavy take on where to find opportunity amid the volatility. Their base case: conflict ends within two months, extreme rallies in energy and defense should be sold, and dips in GCC and East Asian assets are buying opportunities. Worth reading for the contrarian lens.
Recalculating the Iran War's Impact on the Global Economy - Harvard Business Review / March 2026
Focuses on the second-order effects most people are ignoring - fertilizer shortages, helium supply chain disruptions hitting semiconductors, and the compounding inflation effect on emerging markets that were already stretched thin.
Quote of the Week
"The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent - but a system doesn't care about irrational. It cares about price."
Brad Roth
CIO, THOR Financial Technologies
This content reflects the opinions, analyses, and research of THOR Financial Technologies as of the date published. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and should not be relied upon as the basis for any investment decision. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results, and all investments involve risk. For more information, please go to: thorft.com